Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Sambhavi - New Trend
చిన్నవయసులోనే దొంగ స్వాముల తయారి - కలికాలం ...
కూటికోసం కోటి విద్యలు .
డబ్బుకోసం పిల్లల్ని కూడా వదలరు దారుణం.
కూటికోసం కోటి విద్యలు .
డబ్బుకోసం పిల్లల్ని కూడా వదలరు దారుణం.
jaganaa vaadevvadu ???? Who is jagan? ? ?
lol..నవ్వాలా ఏడవాలా .Our fellow men who bowed to us till yesterday can become very courageous suddenly and the change in great dynamics can get very funny. i was surprisingly shocked by the bad joke. But a lesson worth learning and remembering.How quickly can the mind change.Mind and Opportunism...great example....A measurement of how quickly opportunities can restructure the mind.
I will die for telangana soon .
ok, good day.
Just laugh at the jokers its good for our emotional health.
I wonder how many times these politicans will die of fasting for all the funny reasons And at the end of the day get fatter.
And actually the public are much funnier, they listen to this comic stuff all the time.
No politician ever died for a righteous cause in my state after i was born. Its really a gr8 sacrifice for the nation if they die, the public never really even ask for a cause, let alone a righteous cause. Their death can be a nice source of entertainment for a day or two for the public . And what one bulging politician eats per day, will suffice the stomachs of hundreds and thousands of citizens. Isn't that a sacrifice if a fat politician dies.?
-------------
Just laugh at the jokers its good for our emotional health.
I wonder how many times these politicans will die of fasting for all the funny reasons And at the end of the day get fatter.
And actually the public are much funnier, they listen to this comic stuff all the time.
No politician ever died for a righteous cause in my state after i was born. Its really a gr8 sacrifice for the nation if they die, the public never really even ask for a cause, let alone a righteous cause. Their death can be a nice source of entertainment for a day or two for the public . And what one bulging politician eats per day, will suffice the stomachs of hundreds and thousands of citizens. Isn't that a sacrifice if a fat politician dies.?
-------------
karthik jyothi tv9
24nov09 After watching tv9......
I used to like tv9 but this issue revealed how irresponsible even these guys can be.
I wonder why tv9 made such a long funny explanation about hacking trying to make people believe that its possible, (everybody who's on the net for sometime knows about it). And then relate it to karthik. Does proving that hacking is possible make any difference whether karthik did it or not? Hacking is possible, so karthik did it, what kind of a foolish explanation is that.
The first day everyone thought that karthik was a terrible guy, thats how tv9 projected him and did the same today. But anyone who is used to the internet knows how childish the tv9 explanations were to corner karthik . I wonder what hacking karthik did and with what evidence does tv9 or jyothi pounce on him. On the contrary it looks to me that tv9 or jyothi hacked karthik's account an broke the law, they proved their foolishness without asking. Today ravikanth literally made a fool of himself. Looks like tv9 too is involved as karthik was saying in his defense. This is not the kind of journalism that people deserve, or can be fooled with.
We don't know if karthik is innocent or not but tv9 and jyothi are not at all innocent in this issue is evident. It shocked everyone when ravikanth said "what is the eligibility you have that she would have an affair with you" given the context these are funny childish remarks by ravikanth, who tried his best to cover up evidence being produced by కార్తీక్ and wage a one sided attack on him putting the big blunder of describing karthik as a criminal in the first place.
Everyone's watching and its a vain attempt on the part of tv9 to think people are so foolish to take their illogical attitude towards the case so blindly with irresponsible claims & headings. I wonder how they can give such terrible headlines without looking into the matter carefully in the first place. Did they do it to sensationalize at the cost of a common guy with common conflicts or does tv9 too have a cunning political role in this as karthik is claiming.
Karthik did reply practically and consistently to the inconsistent approach of tv9 & jyothi.
I'm not supporting anybody here, but only could see how journalism is going to the dogs by taking an issue personally.Whatever karthik was treated unfairly in the name of online fraud towards women or whatever.I felt it would be nice to educate people on online frauds rather than make some guy a scapegoat to sell a foolish irresponsible caption or exploit a personal issue blown out of proportions.
I didn't understand when ravikanth was asking how can you prove your innocence? when there is no evidence that karthik hacked it. Will anyone of you agree if i say you hacked it, or my enemy hacked it, without any proof. Is there any sense in the claims or why tv9 is backing jyothi one way, instead of taking an objective approach why did tv9 simply corner this guy with irresponsible negative claims. And why did ravikanth shy away the straight questions put by karthik. Why did he deliberately shift attention away from what karthik was saying.
Why is karthik framed based on assumptions.I think tv9 needs to give an explanation on why it is making a deliberate attempt to corner karthik for now. Maybe he's guilty, but how can tv9 pronounce him guilty even before any investigation is made.Pronouncing someone guilty,making false claims without proper evidence is fraudulent in itself. One should be ashamed of such cheap journalism. Or should we think these people are so incapable of estimating a situation and imagine that people will be carried away by such illogical fanciful explanations.
And its quite a loose talk when ravikanth says we will garland you if we find you not guilty, after all the false allegations and defamation. He seems to be supporting the philosophy of freely making false allegations on a guy out of improper analysis and then say sorry. Can't they be patient enough before the investigation or proper evidence is out. before the accused is found guilty.
Is this how a reputed tv channel like tv9 conducts itself. Then why the police department and the courts if the judgement is directly pronounced on air without any evidence. You call somebody guilty on a tv channel and tell the whole world, as if you have seen it, without any evidence,what's all this nonsense and why do people accept this unethical behavior from a reputed tv channel.
If a women comes and says ravikanth raped her, without any proper evidence,will they pronounce him a rapist and air it,without any proof, proper investigation or evidence, will you give headlines, tv9 news reader a rapist,take interviews, and if he's not found guilty, will a garland do, and until then you broadcast day in & out, ravikanth the rapist .What kind of reasoning is that,which we have seen today. Are we in our senses. Don't we see how foolish biased character assassination can be and that too on air.
Karthik has conducted himself far more gracefully than ravikanth or jyothi did.This is my frank opinion. If he's bluffing everybody with his intelligence then we have to wait for the investigation team to give its findings. But why impatient conclusions and unethical loose talk from a reputed tv channel. And is this kind of journalism not conductive to exploitation? Does it bring about a better society.
---------
Note : I'm not supporting anybody here, not karthik in the least. just reflecting on what happened now, this is what i feel for what happened on tv9 today and how things are being conducted on this matter as of today, as a personal opinion. I like many programs that tv9 do, but when some projections are out of balance its out of balance and in bad taste.
I used to like tv9 but this issue revealed how irresponsible even these guys can be.
I wonder why tv9 made such a long funny explanation about hacking trying to make people believe that its possible, (everybody who's on the net for sometime knows about it). And then relate it to karthik. Does proving that hacking is possible make any difference whether karthik did it or not? Hacking is possible, so karthik did it, what kind of a foolish explanation is that.
The first day everyone thought that karthik was a terrible guy, thats how tv9 projected him and did the same today. But anyone who is used to the internet knows how childish the tv9 explanations were to corner karthik . I wonder what hacking karthik did and with what evidence does tv9 or jyothi pounce on him. On the contrary it looks to me that tv9 or jyothi hacked karthik's account an broke the law, they proved their foolishness without asking. Today ravikanth literally made a fool of himself. Looks like tv9 too is involved as karthik was saying in his defense. This is not the kind of journalism that people deserve, or can be fooled with.
We don't know if karthik is innocent or not but tv9 and jyothi are not at all innocent in this issue is evident. It shocked everyone when ravikanth said "what is the eligibility you have that she would have an affair with you" given the context these are funny childish remarks by ravikanth, who tried his best to cover up evidence being produced by కార్తీక్ and wage a one sided attack on him putting the big blunder of describing karthik as a criminal in the first place.
Everyone's watching and its a vain attempt on the part of tv9 to think people are so foolish to take their illogical attitude towards the case so blindly with irresponsible claims & headings. I wonder how they can give such terrible headlines without looking into the matter carefully in the first place. Did they do it to sensationalize at the cost of a common guy with common conflicts or does tv9 too have a cunning political role in this as karthik is claiming.
Karthik did reply practically and consistently to the inconsistent approach of tv9 & jyothi.
I'm not supporting anybody here, but only could see how journalism is going to the dogs by taking an issue personally.Whatever karthik was treated unfairly in the name of online fraud towards women or whatever.I felt it would be nice to educate people on online frauds rather than make some guy a scapegoat to sell a foolish irresponsible caption or exploit a personal issue blown out of proportions.
I didn't understand when ravikanth was asking how can you prove your innocence? when there is no evidence that karthik hacked it. Will anyone of you agree if i say you hacked it, or my enemy hacked it, without any proof. Is there any sense in the claims or why tv9 is backing jyothi one way, instead of taking an objective approach why did tv9 simply corner this guy with irresponsible negative claims. And why did ravikanth shy away the straight questions put by karthik. Why did he deliberately shift attention away from what karthik was saying.
Why is karthik framed based on assumptions.I think tv9 needs to give an explanation on why it is making a deliberate attempt to corner karthik for now. Maybe he's guilty, but how can tv9 pronounce him guilty even before any investigation is made.Pronouncing someone guilty,making false claims without proper evidence is fraudulent in itself. One should be ashamed of such cheap journalism. Or should we think these people are so incapable of estimating a situation and imagine that people will be carried away by such illogical fanciful explanations.
And its quite a loose talk when ravikanth says we will garland you if we find you not guilty, after all the false allegations and defamation. He seems to be supporting the philosophy of freely making false allegations on a guy out of improper analysis and then say sorry. Can't they be patient enough before the investigation or proper evidence is out. before the accused is found guilty.
Is this how a reputed tv channel like tv9 conducts itself. Then why the police department and the courts if the judgement is directly pronounced on air without any evidence. You call somebody guilty on a tv channel and tell the whole world, as if you have seen it, without any evidence,what's all this nonsense and why do people accept this unethical behavior from a reputed tv channel.
If a women comes and says ravikanth raped her, without any proper evidence,will they pronounce him a rapist and air it,without any proof, proper investigation or evidence, will you give headlines, tv9 news reader a rapist,take interviews, and if he's not found guilty, will a garland do, and until then you broadcast day in & out, ravikanth the rapist .What kind of reasoning is that,which we have seen today. Are we in our senses. Don't we see how foolish biased character assassination can be and that too on air.
Karthik has conducted himself far more gracefully than ravikanth or jyothi did.This is my frank opinion. If he's bluffing everybody with his intelligence then we have to wait for the investigation team to give its findings. But why impatient conclusions and unethical loose talk from a reputed tv channel. And is this kind of journalism not conductive to exploitation? Does it bring about a better society.
---------
Note : I'm not supporting anybody here, not karthik in the least. just reflecting on what happened now, this is what i feel for what happened on tv9 today and how things are being conducted on this matter as of today, as a personal opinion. I like many programs that tv9 do, but when some projections are out of balance its out of balance and in bad taste.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)